Skip to content
Innovation·4 min read

When the Impossible Becomes Urgent

A crisis often reveals that an institution had more speed, flexibility, and decision-making capacity than its normal routines allowed it to use.


Organisations sometimes call a task impossible when what they really mean is that doing it would disturb too many routines.

A crisis makes the distinction obvious.

Projects expected to take years suddenly take months. Teams that could barely schedule a meeting start speaking every day. Budgets move. Reporting lines change. Approvals that had acquired the weight of law are shortened, combined, or quietly abandoned.

The surprising part is how often the underlying capability was already there. The priority was not.

In ordinary times, an organisation is protecting many things at once: revenue, reputation, internal relationships, existing customers, procedure, and the comfort of knowing what happens next. A new idea has to negotiate with all of them.

An emergency changes the arithmetic. The cost of doing nothing becomes visible, sometimes overnight. Uncertainty that looked unacceptable on Monday can look perfectly reasonable by Friday if the alternative has become worse.

That does not mean crisis deserves credit for whatever gets accomplished during it. The rapid development of COVID-era vaccines rested on years of research, manufacturing knowledge, scientific infrastructure, and prior work on mRNA technology. Urgency accelerated funding, coordination, testing, and deployment. It did not invent the underlying science in a few frantic months.

That distinction is important. Urgency can mobilise capability. It cannot conjure capability that was never built.

Crises also produce bad decisions. Speed can crowd out dissent. Fear can make thin evidence feel sufficient. Temporary powers can acquire permanent defenders. Nobody should want an organisation to behave forever as if the building is on fire.

The more useful question is which parts of emergency behaviour deserve to survive the emergency.

Clear priorities probably do. Smaller decision groups often do. Shorter feedback loops, named owners, and a willingness to ask whether an approval genuinely prevents harm are useful in calm periods too.

Calm matters because it gives people room to think. But calm can become a very respectable form of sleep if every routine is protected simply because it already exists.

A crisis reminds us that some limits are real and others are procedural habits that have been repeated until they feel structural.

It is better to learn the difference deliberately than to wait for an emergency to teach it for us.